Ask Your Question

Do solar panels take more energy to manufacture than they ever produce?

asked 2015-02-20 13:28:37 -0500

OverDawn gravatar image

I've heard that solar panels never 'pay off' their 'energy debt' - that it takes more energy to produce one than they'll ever generate in their lifetime. From an environment perspective, going solar wouldn't be worth it (especially if fossil fuels are used in the manufacturing process!) What's the energy payback period for the average solar panel?

edit retag flag offensive close delete

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted

answered 2015-03-04 11:34:35 -0500

this post is marked as community wiki

This post is a wiki. Anyone with karma >75 is welcome to improve it.

updated 2015-03-04 11:34:35 -0500

energysage gravatar image

Hi OverDawn,

This is definitely false. According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, depending on the technology, the energy payback period for a rooftop solar system is 1-5 years.

There are lots of factors that influence a solar system's energy payback period, but the main ones are the energy used in manufacture of components, how far those components needed to be shipped and where the panels are put into operation (e.g. if the system is in a sunny spot like Arizona, the payback time will be shorter).

Another thing to consider is what the electricity carbon emissions benchmark is in the place you plan to have the panels installed. If you live somewhere where coal is the primary source of electricity, there's no question that going solar will result in a net reduction in CO2 emissions. (Lindsay Wilson at the Energy Collective put together an interesting piece on the topic based on an academic paper. It's well worth a read.)

edit flag offensive delete publish link more
Login/Signup to Answer

Question tools


subscribe to rss feed


Asked: 2015-02-20 13:28:37 -0500

Seen: 834 times

Last updated: Mar 04 '15